Quote:
Now then, why should we now take anything you said and believe it? Quite frankly, you are an elitist, a hypocrit, aswell you are trying to marginalize what I am saying. Its funny how you say that your not that religious, but one would suspect that you are religious, none-the-less.
You don't have to believe anything of what I say, but the same apply for me about you. The whole point of arguing is to explain your point and try to make other understand it, and that's what we are both trying to do.
What you're saying basically is that everyone with a different opinion are trying to "force it" on you when they simply defending their point like you do, which make you the biggest hypocrite here.
And no, I'm not a religious person. You're making that assumption because I'm taking the opposite side in this debate. I've done this debate many times, and I always pick the side that is currently being bashed.
Quote:
You have no grasp on my maturity with this subject.
My bad, I forgot how mature you are.
The biggest problem with people like you is your ego, which is bigger than mine. When you take in consideration that mine is really big, your's scaring the **** out of me.
Quote:
I indeed believe that the universe is infinite, but saying something created it is just trying to rationalize something that is infinite. This, you cannot do in science, as you should know. Somethings need to stand the test of time before they are taught. You try to marginalize what I am stating by saying that Im an angry Atheist....
I did not said "something was created". Reread my statement, because you clearly misunderstood it.
The formulation of an hypothesis is one of the most important aspect of science. Saying there was a "beginning", and call it God is an hypothesis that is waiting to be confirmed, or disproven. I don't know why you're having problem with that, because it doesn't at any time contradict what science is doing.
Do you really think Newton physic is a "fact"? No, we all know it was only a theory and it was proven wrong.
Do you think Einstein was right with his relativity? No, his theory was also "wrong". Quantum physic? Ditto. String physics (no clue how it's named in english), it's the current theory, but chance is it will be proven wrong.
Obviously, making a theory about the ultimate explanation is a guess, but has long you don't have the tool to prove or disprove it, you can't say he is wrong to make this particular hypothesis.
Quote:
but saying something created it is just trying to rationalize something that is infinite
Sqrt(-1).
Can you rationalize that?
Ironically, you can see physical manifestation of something mathematically "irrationnal" (ie: Black hole).
Just because there is a concept beyond what you can grasp doesn't mean it doesn't exit.
The same could be said about the number 0, who appeared very late in mankind's history.
Quote:
You state that there is not same-sex marrige due, not to religion, but "Marriage, civil or religious, exist mostly for the purpose of procreation."
No, I said there is more reason for the same-sex marriage laws other than religious laws.
Quote:
Now then, please explain this: Why state one thing, yet act completely different?
Uncertainty Principle
_________________
Main: War75/Sam63/Blm71/Rng45
Sub: Nin37/Thf37/Whm37/Mnk30
Three nation: Done Zilart: Done CoP: Done